New Criticism for an old-ish city

TO ALL SUBSCRIBERS OF OUR BLOG! Manchester Review of Books has been going since October, 2016, as a WordPress website.


We see a continuing need for a Manchester literature platform. I wrote very briefly for New Cross Review of Books and now we have Brixton Review of Books. They are great, but they are all in London and you know the LRB, and its London-centrism, and all of that. Our editorial policy is to talk to the city of Manchester from within the city, but looking outwards, to Europe, and to the world. Do I need to explain why? The general election of December 2019 seems to be part of this Manchester Review of Books re-constitution on paper.

The Manchester Review of Books website contained no pictures of books right from the start, just writing. We wanted it to be as unspectacular as possible from the beginning, to go against the grain of the pizza-vomits of colour reproducing the same banal visual content you see all over the web. The planned single broadsheet edition will continue in this vein.

We’re not making some statement about this being ‘radical’, far from it, we just wanted to pare it right down to something basic and useable. We may have a visual element from time to time, cartoons, visual poems, but not illustrations, not infantile pictures of books you can see in two seconds via a Google hit. Just the thing itself, not the glamourised consumer sheen.

We’re producing what might be seen as a very old-fashioned broadsheet. We’re fine with that, but it will be one trying to overcome the widespread death of adult thinking. It will not be dumbed-down. It will begin very basically and develop slowly. It will contain lots of reading material for people whom we assume read a lot. If you want to call that ‘value for money’, feel free.

We are making changes though. We’re dispensing with our ‘only positive reviews, ignore the rest’ ethos which we have (largely) held until now. The vapid state of arts and culture needs a rebooted cultural criticism that isn’t afraid to speak and isn’t compromised.

Our back-of-a-fag-packet economics for moving into a print edition runs like this: On 500 copies per single-sheet issue, each issue costs 0.084 of a penny per issue. Call it a penny. We can get A5 envelopes for around a penny. Second class post is 61p. Physically then, the thing costs 63-64p to be made and delivered to you – the largest cost is Royal Mail’s charge – but of course there’s our labour and organisation. If we say a pound per issue, plus a pound into our kitty, we can start by charging five pounds for a four-issue subscription.

This means we can build, very slowly and modestly, and with a few subs upfront we can pay the print costs for the first few issues. The first print run is £42 and so we need eight new subscribers to meet that first print bill. Let’s say ten, to figure in rising costs (they are). If we get well-established, we will then offer our first ten subscribers free lifetime subs.

Sound reasonable? We think it does.

To subscribe at a rate of £5 for four issues please email The Editors at

Burgess beyond Burgess

Anthony Burgess, Life, Work, Reputation, Centenary Conference – International Anthony Burgess Foundation, Manchester

One thing marked this conference out from the start, a simple rule: No Clockwork Orange. That slim work has become so swollen that it has eclipsed the burning star of Burgess’s talent. It definitely needs to orbit away somewhat.

But can you imagine another conference or arts festival doing that, at this point in history? Or even a university event? There would be Alex mugs and bowler hats for sale with expensive ironic vitamin milk during the breaks.

Not here. There was a straightforward dignity about this event. The idea of Burgess scholars relaying the dark side of The Burgess World for three days might sound off-putting to the more casual reader. But the papers were all accessible, as well as high quality. There was a generous intellectual atmosphere on both sides, that of the presenters and the audience. People enquired in the spirit of wanting to know, there was no needling. There was an early start each day – lots of papers were got through – and the atmosphere was unpretentious and non-combative, at the same time as it was never dumbed-down. All of these things are possible, they can exist in one space. PhD students can give papers without feeling they are about to be torn apart by horrible grey wolf professors.

One of the main pleasures over the three days was this: To take a slice of Burgess is to take a slice of the entire twentieth century. Earthly Powers is perhaps the concentrated form of this, but Burgess is clearly a world-historical writer, and many of the papers spoke to that theme. The papers were skilfully grouped to speak to the larger dimensions of Burgess’s work, Empire, for instance.

According to Nicholas Rankin on ‘Burgess in Gibraltar’, the ‘comic dimension’ of Burgess’s take on Empire was ‘well-meaningness gone wrong’. Siti Saridah Adenan followed this with a paper on ‘Lethargic Empire’ and ‘Boredom in Burgess’s Malayan Novels’. She discussed empire and detachment, in the Burgess character Fenella Crabbe, who sees her new Malayan surroundings as a ‘shabby version of Europe’. Here we got Malaya as boring, as opposed to London, the thrilling centre of Empire.

Crabbe also described the north of England as provincial. Crabbe believed civilisation only happens in temperate climates, ‘where sweat starts, nothing starts’, she explained. There are echoes of this in the current although fundamentally broken London-centric attitudes that have recently been cracked by the vote to leave the EU in 2016. The start of the Cold War in Gibraltar, said Burgess, will also ‘be the end of it’, and perhaps only now can we see how truly prophetic that was.

Matthew Whittle explained how Matthew Arnold was important to Burgess. He took up the quest of the middle class guide for the masses. For Burgess the TV was static and the music hall was social. Television, for Burgess, was the ‘brutal hypnotic eye’. Great points were made here about Burgess’s theme of the little individual versus the imposition of the state, in his novel The Doctor Is Sick, Clockwork Orange and elsewhere. The paper on the The Doctor Is Sick, actually, by Jess Roberts was enthralling.

Burgess’s Toryism must surely be a part of his attitude, but elsewhere we heard how in Italy ‘Burgess rooted for the anarchists and communists’. Burgess was one of those truly independent liberal intellectuals, in the strong sense of that, a permanent dissident and a man who knew his own mind seemingly instinctively, then put that opinion forward no matter who it offended.

Burgess, uncovered by the obscuring bulk of Clockwork Orange, is essentially a rich archive curated by Andrew Biswell and his colleagues, novels, non-fiction, poetry and music. We went to the Bridgewater Hall on Tuesday night for the premiere of a Burgess symphony. The book reviews of Burgess, as with Orwell, are a whole other historical dimension. Joe Darlington’s paper on these was magnificent.

In a break, Manchester Review of Books writers discussed the Burgess reviews and blurbs they had encountered: As novel readers, in their student days; they were all over, including one on the dust jacket of a single-volume dictionary which simply said ‘this is a fine dictionary’. Burgess perhaps over-reviewed, but he was a staunch advocate of the less successful writers he admired, as well as those he considered to have potential.

There are very large archives beyond not only Clockwork Orange, but beyond all the published work. This said, the ‘No Clockwork’ rule was actually broken three times (let’s call it a rule of thumb) for a paper on performing and re-performing the work for theatre in different countries, translating it into French, and a keynote presentation by Jonathon Green, the slang expert who has been described as the ‘greatest Lexicographer since Johnson’.

Green was there to talk about the recently discovered Nadsat Dictionary fragments. And they are really fragments. But the other thing this conference had was a sense of humour. Green and others addressed this aborted project with an endearing mix of reverence and gentle laughter. Andrew Biswell put up a slide ‘of Burgess getting pissed’, how he would like us to remember him, and Burgess was well remembered throughout.

In fact it felt like he was strangely present, as his piano and other bits of furniture were in the room with us. Many of the discussions ended up talking of ‘Anthony Burgess’ – after all, only a pen name for a bloke called John Wilson – as a shifting series of layers, rather than a solid core. Taken this way, Burgess was in fact present, as the archive holds many of those layers, some of which are still being discovered. Burgess had not, as the saying goes, ‘left the building’. I think John Wilson would have loved this.

We took a coach ride to see No End To Enderby at The Whitworth, which is definitely worth a visit. Then we went on to Xaverian College, Burgess’s old school, then to a drinks reception. Some have claimed that Manchester and Burgess have little real connection, International Anthony Burgess Foundation is changing that erroneous perception.

But they are doing so much more: Here, actually, is the model for the new arts festival, the new conference, and perhaps even the new university. The idiocy of student tuition fees is only just being declared by the politicians who originally advised them. The conference was clearly subsidised, there were no berserk, excluding fees. In fact it was probably cheaper to go to this conference than to sit at home and eat your own supplies. There were no patronising, infantile stage dressings or speeches. The usual galaxy of alibis on a double page spread at the back of the guide was entirely absent. There was no feedback form with a marketing intern standing over you waiting to collect.

The generosity of the Burgess estate is clear: Burgess was a tax exile and criticised for it; he put his money into properties when the tax rate for his income bracket – under Wilson – was 90%, but his estate has now put that money back into Manchester with a faith in the city even Burgess couldn’t quite match some days.

If you swap the patrician capitalism of International Anthony Burgess Foundation for a return to state funding, you have a very good model, in this conference, of how to do things. Formally, the ‘less-is-more’ approach of concentrating on the things that matter and doing them with style, humour, generosity and a fuss-free seriousness should be adopted all over the arts and humanities.

International Anthony Burgess Foundation, Manchester Review of Books salutes you, and all who sail in you.

New Stories for the Old City

Manchester has its own Literature Festival, it should have its own Review of Books, but it needs new, fecund myths, the old ones are dried-out husks.

Walking through Manchester city centre the other day, I noticed that a section of Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures sleeve hangs in neon over the serving counter of a posh pizza restaurant. Don’t they know ‘Joy Division Oven Gloves’ by Half Man Half Biscuit? Manchester’s tedious afterimage – and it is an afterglow – is largely the fault of the films 24 Hour Party People and Control. The whole reverence for Joy Division, The Smiths and ‘Madchester’ bores me to tears. Walking the city, the little glyph under the ‘Haçienda’ occasionally flashes up in the periphery of your vision, an accent, but an accent as a hook that the city’s mythmakers have hung themselves on.

‘The Haçienda must be built’ was coined by Ivan Chtcheglov the poor, half-mad Situationist, who was arrested en route to the Eiffel Tower with armloads of dynamite, intent on blowing it up because its lights kept him awake at night. Engels urgently needs to return to Manchester to observe the homeless situation, but maybe Chtcheglov needs to return to Manchester to detonate its myths. Blast them into atoms so tiny that the original stories can no longer be read. In 2016, perhaps the Haçienda must be finally demolished. Because these stories, now flattened a millimetre thin by their endless circulation, conceal richer ones.

Bob Dickinson told me that the late, brilliant Alan Wise told him that the force of the blast of the 1996 IRA bomb created a space of physics inside the legendary red post box that was, momentarily, a gateway to another dimension. This ‘fact’ was apparently ‘read somewhere’ – in an article by an Indian physicist which was eventually mislaid. Manchester Area Psychogeography levitated the Corn Exchange only months before the bomb. Just over the way from this post-box-stargate, is the Waterstones where Jeff Noon worked: Totally independent of Alan Wise, The Raw Shark Texts by Steven Hall posits a portal to another universe in Deansgate Waterstones. Peter Barlow’s Cigarette, a literary event sometimes hosted there, takes place within this zone of Pure Weird. You can go and have a coffee there. The Sober and The Space Cadets are one here, yet Manchester can’t seem to produce a single decent radical independent bookshop at its centre.

Similarly, the Manchester and Salford literary traditions swing between transgressive and straight, great and average: De Quincey, the deeply conservative Mrs Gaskell, Mary Barton, North & South, then the great Shelagh Delaney. But Walter Greenwood, wooden blocks of dead socialist rhetoric dropping to the floor, in contrast with The Classic Slum by Robert Roberts. Then there’s Savoy Books with David Britton and Michael Butterworth. Jeff Noon, Vurt, Pollen and Nymphomation, Alice in Wonderland, via Manchester in the late 1980s. But one big problem is that the old psychogeographical reserves are now very drained and strained. Psychogeography is part of the university curriculum, like Defoe or Dickens, so we cannot fully rely on stories like the one above anymore either.

But this doesn’t really matter, because Good Things Are Happening. The Anthony Burgess Centre, with its highly important ‘International’ status, is a great hub for Manchester writers. But the things that spring up in the cracks of the pavement are just as important: Verbose and The Other Room are amazing particle colliders for new experiments with words and sounds, which have their parallel in nights such as The Noise Upstairs at Fuel in Withington.

But the old, bloated corpses still weigh heavily on the city: ‘Manchester, So Much To Answer For’ was a line that originally diagnosed the Brady and Hindley murders, but has since swollen to designate anything and everything that originated in the city region, brilliant, bad or plain evil. We cannot allow our city to pivot on six words that once fell out of Morrisey’s mouth, that would clearly be foolish.

This piece of writing is not meant as an exhaustive account of textual production in Manchester, or its many literary scenes, that would also be foolish, but it is a proposal that we drop the old stories and make new ones. We need to make very particular, politicised new myths. The Haçienda and Madchester myths must go precisely because they sit on the highest curve of the Neoconservative rollercoaster.

But surely, two things that also need to be brought lower in Britain are the tumescent and still ballooning influence of Iain Sinclair on literature and Patrick Keiller on film. Every other gallery show I see or piece of ‘writing on place’ I read is struggling to escape from under the flabby buttocks of Sinclair and Keiller. Their work is great, but all writing emerges from ‘place’. ‘How must it be recalibrated now?’ is the burning question.

Demolition Polka was a popular Strauss waltz, as cities exploded in the nineteenth century. We see again how the risk and hedging of capital have turned our public spaces into Demolition Poker, with Pomona seceded to banality and Rogue Studios sold off to developers. The city is being ripped up and re-laid under our feet again, and so perhaps we need to re-enter this game with rigged cards, or new strategies. What are the literary equivalents of Set-Mining, The Reverse Tell, The Soul Read, The Stop and Go or The Triple-Barrel Bluff? Manchester needs new Magic. But it needs new myths that the capitalists cannot swallow. In fact, it needs stories that will make them choke and turn bluer than they already are.